Very weak ammo rack and frequently damaged crew/modules due to compact size.Hull armor is not reliable compared with predecessor T-54 which takes some getting used to.Below average gun depression at -6 degrees however, this is 1 degree better than its counterpart, the T-62A (-5).Thin turret roof and vulnerable hatches make stationary hull down play (along with side/face hugging) a poor decision.Extremely low profile makes it a very small target to shoot at.Mostly strong turret face, and slightly greater frontal armor slope allows for slightly more effective armor than the T-62A.Very good maneuverability though traverse and terrain resistance, though slightly lower than the T-62A.Fantastic 100mm gun with best at-tier DPM as well as good gun handling characteristics (aim time and dispersion).Excellent top and straight line speed, greater than the T-62A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |